Well, John McCain has arrived. The first ‘official’ bimbo erruption of his presidential campaign has occured. According to Drudge:
McCain has personally pleaded with NY TIMES editor Bill Keller not to publish the high-impact report involving key telecom legislation before the Senate Commerce Committee, newsroom insiders tell the DRUDGE REPORT.
Now, over at Don Surber’s place, he gives us this:
Did the New York Times hire Jayson Blair back? Because this story sure ain’t much other than both sides denying it.
From the people who gave us with a straight face “sex is private” and “MoveOn there is nothing to see here” comes: NYT: “For McCain, Self-Confidence on Ethics Poses Its Own Risk.”
Based on this I think McCain is more like Bill Clinton and JFK than Obama could ever hope to be. And from the same people who brought you Bill, JFK and even Teddy Kennedy, don’t be handing me any “we believe in strong family values.” Neither of these parties have what the people in fly-over country call family values.
Could someone tell me what is up with the …. wrinkles around this woman’s waist? [See photo below.] It looks like either she needs a slip to camoflauge her lace panties or her Depends are damp. A woman should never wear a dress such as that with regular underwear. There are specialty foundation garments that you purchase in order to give a smooth flow to the gown.
If I’d spent that much money on a gown, you bet your d*mn *ss not the first wrinkle of undergarments would be showing … even if I had to go without them.
5 Comments
February 21, 2008 at 10:21 am
How dare you compare McCan’t (keep it in his pants) or Billy Jeff to JFK.
Neither Lewinsky nor this skank ain’t got nuttin’ on Norma Jeane.
February 21, 2008 at 10:31 am
Hee hee! Point taken.
Yes, there was only 1 JFK (and Norma Jeane). Yet so many are trying to be considered his heir.
February 21, 2008 at 11:46 pm
I know you’re not a McCain fan (nor am I, for that matter), Muze, but doesn’t it seem a little harsh to lump him in with JFK or Bubba on the chick-magnet scale based on one NYT story that everybody involved has denied? And it’s not even current?
What’s more interesting to me is that apparently the NYT had this story for a while and was sitting on it, as it did with the story that broke Duhbya’s wiretapping program. What all else are they sitting on? And if it’s so iron clad and important, why wait until so late in the game when the GOP field is down to 2?
February 22, 2008 at 10:35 am
Oh, I’m not really lumping him in. I don’t care if he dallies unless he lies about it under oath.
I’m just saying that behavior like that makes him as eligible of a candidate as Billy Boy and JFK for those liberals who don’t want to support the banshee.
I don’t like McCain. And when the National Party fundraisers called my home the other evening to solicit a donation to “defeat the liberal Dems”, I stated three times “I will NOT donate to the national party because they have not given us a viable conservative candidate.”
I don’t know what I’m going to do in November. I guess write someone in.
February 27, 2008 at 8:13 pm
Gotta love the depends!